Skip to content

Golden results: published numbers we use as regression tests

Compiled 2026-09-26. Every value below was quoted from a fetched primary source (paper full text, supplementary table, authors' repository, official data file or API) on that date. Values computed by us from an authors' file are labelled "computed". Nothing is from memory. The unabridged extraction with per-cell source locations is docs/research/golden_results_raw.md and docs/research/data_malecns.md.

How this file is used:

  • Each row becomes a test in tests/golden/ once the corresponding module exists. Tier 0 runs in normal CI (fixture-sized or cached-data tests); Tiers 1–3 are marked golden and run in the scheduled/manual heavy workflow.
  • "Tolerance" is our proposal, with the reasoning in the Notes column. Exact means byte/integer equality.
  • Known inconsistencies between sources are listed in §7 so nobody "fixes" a test to the wrong number.

Source keys: Shiu24 Shiu et al., Nature 634:210 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9; Shiu-repo github.com/philshiu/Drosophila_brain_model (MIT); Shiu-ST its Supplementary Tables xlsx (41586_2024_7763_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx); Dork24 Dorkenwald et al., Nature 634:124 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y; Schl24 Schlegel et al., Nature 634:139 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07686-5; Lin24 Lin et al., Nature 634:153 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07968-y; Eck24 Eckstein et al., Cell 187:2574 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016; Sche20 Scheffer et al., eLife 9:e57443 (2020); Take24 Takemura et al., eLife 13:RP97769 (2024); Cheong25 Cheong et al., eLife doi:10.7554/eLife.96084; MCNS26 Berg et al., Cell 189:5504 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.08.015 (numbers from the Europe PMC abstract and the bioRxiv v1 preprint 10.1101/2025.10.09.680999, because the Cell full text returned HTTP 403); BANC26 Bates et al., Nature (2026) doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10735-w; CI25 Yin et al., bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.09.29.679410.


1. Tier 0 — dataset counts (exact, checked on ingest)

1.1 MaleCNS v1.0 (computed from the official flat files, SHA-256 in DATA_SOURCES.md)

Quantity Value Source Tolerance
Neurons (rows with non-null superclass in body-annotations) 166,700 computed; equals MCNS26 abstract "166,700 neurons" and neuPrint count(:Neuron) WHERE superclass IS NOT NULL exact
Rows in body-annotations file 211,577 computed exact
Bodies with status == "Traced" 165,122 computed; equals neuPrint exact
Distinct type among neurons 11,751 computed (abstract says 11,710; see §7) exact vs file
Rows in body-neurotransmitters file 1,835,518 computed exact
Edges in connectome-weights (all segments) 151,856,684 computed exact
Sum of weights (= total PSDs = neuPrint Meta.totalPostCount) 311,833,243 computed; neuPrint exact
Presynapses (T-bars), sum of body-stats pre = neuPrint Meta.totalPreCount 45,656,140 computed; neuPrint exact
Traced→Traced edges / weight 25,563,197 / 124,025,046 computed; equals row count of the -traced-only file exact
neuPrint Neuron→Neuron ConnectsTo edges / weight 25,862,574 / 125,024,863 neuPrint Cypher on male-cns:v1.0 exact (this is the "~125M synapses" figure)
Edges with weight ≥5 / ≥10 (all segments) 7,622,864 / 2,799,910 computed exact
Traced→Traced edges with weight ≥5 / ≥10 6,235,682 / 2,749,407 computed exact
Superclass counts ol_intrinsic 89,403; cb_intrinsic 32,164; vnc_intrinsic 13,161; visual_projection 9,201; descending_neuron 1,314; ascending_neuron 1,846; vnc_motor 708; cb_motor 107 (full table in research note) computed exact
Body-level predicted_nt among Traced bodies acetylcholine 94,946; glutamate 28,055; gaba 20,218; unclear 14,365; dopamine 4,443; histamine 2,026; serotonin 465; octopamine 102 computed exact
Minimum conf_pre / conf_post in syn-partners (sampled batches) 0.700 / 0.500 computed via HTTP range reads informational

1.2 FlyWire / FAFB

Quantity Value Dataset Source Tolerance
Proofread neurons 139,255 v783 Dork24, Schl24, Lin24, Codex header exact
Synapses between proofread neurons 54.5 million v783 Dork24 ±0.1 M
Connections ≥5 synapses / neurons involved 2,700,513 / 134,181 v783 Dork24 (Lin24 says 2,701,601; see §7) ±0.05 %
Unthresholded weighted edges ≈15.1 million v783 Schl24 ±0.1 M
Connections >100 / >1,000 synapses 15,837 / 27 v783 Dork24 exact
Intrinsic neurons 118,501 v783 Dork24 exact
Central-brain intrinsic / optic-lobe intrinsic 32,388 / 77,536 v783 Dork24, Schl24 exact
VPNs / VCNs 8,053 / 524 v783 Dork24, Schl24 exact
Sensory / ascending / descending 5,512 / 2,362 / 1,303 v783 Schl24, Dork24 exact
Motor / endocrine 106 / 80 v783 Dork24 exact
Cell types annotated 8,453 (covers 96.4 % of neurons) v783 Schl24 exact
Median in / out degree, intrinsic, ≥5 syn 11 / 13 v783 Dork24 exact
Neurons in v630 snapshot 127,978 v630 Lin24 Methods; matches Codex v630 cell_stats.csv.gz row count (computed) exact
Connections ≥5 synapses (v630) 2,613,129 v630 Lin24 exact
Unthresholded connections (v630) ≈14.7 million v630 Lin24 ±0.1 M
Kenyon cells 2,597 (R) / 2,580 (L) v783 Schl24 exact
Photoreceptors: compound eye / ocelli / eyelets 11,118 / 273 / 8 v783 Dork24 exact
Whole-volume NT fractions (as quoted by Shiu24 from Eck24) ≈55 % ACh, 24 % Glu, 14 % GABA, 7 % DA+OA+5-HT v630 Shiu24 Methods ±2 pp

1.3 Shiu et al. model input file (the LIF golden input)

The model does not use the Codex connections.csv (≥5 threshold). It uses an unthresholded v630 export shipped in the MIT-licensed repo: 2023_03_23_connectivity_630_final.parquet (86,630,944 bytes; local copy SHA-256 94db8c650533bc36ffa3223f2e62325d5648b8d6bd31c3a4e1c804628c7557b3) and 2023_03_23_completeness_630_final.csv (3,057,611 bytes; SHA-256 e6b71e17671a9bdb05f55e4bc6774640a1418cb7a05125e0fc994ad40f9bfdfb). The repo also ships Connectivity_783.parquet (100,804,642 bytes) and Completeness_783.csv.

Quantity Value Source Tolerance
Neurons in model 127,400 Shiu24 Methods; completeness csv rows (computed) exact
Edges 14,687,178 computed from parquet exact
Minimum synapse count per edge 1 (no threshold) computed; edges with 1/2/3/4/5 synapses: 7,305,126 / 2,611,152 / 1,342,881 / 813,991 / 542,616 exact
Total synapses 52,793,639 computed (sum(Connectivity)) exact
Excitatory / inhibitory edges 8,800,532 / 5,886,646 computed exact
Max weight +1,801 (exc) / −2,358 (inh) computed exact
Columns Presynaptic_ID, Postsynaptic_ID, Presynaptic_Index, Postsynaptic_Index, Connectivity, Excitatory, Excitatory x Connectivity computed exact

1.4 Other datasets

Quantity Value Dataset Source Tolerance
MaleCNS neurons / types (preprint) 166,691 / 11,691 v0.9-era preprint MCNS26 bioRxiv v1 abstract informational (v1.0 file gives 166,700 / 11,751)
MaleCNS cross-matched central-brain types 7,319; 114 dimorphic, 262 male-specific, 69 female-specific v1.0 vs FlyWire MCNS26 preprint (Cell abstract: 8,069 isomorphic, 138 dimorphic, 289 male-specific, 71 female-specific) see §7
MaleCNS neurons matched to FAFB/hemibrain/MANC 97.5 % (CB 96.4 %, OL 98.8 %, VNC 93.1 %) v1.0 MCNS26 preprint ±0.5 pp
Hemibrain traced neurons 21,663 (v1.1; "no updates to the connectome" in v1.2.1) hemibrain dvid.io release blog; FlyEM exact on traced-neurons.csv row count
Hemibrain "well-reconstructed" neurons used by Eck24 24,666 v1.2.1 Eck24 informational
Hemibrain synapses "about 20 million" between traced neurons; 64 M PSDs, 9.5 M T-bars in volume v1.1 Sche20 approximate
MANC neurons / T-bars / PSDs ~23,000 / 10 M / 74 M v1.0 Take24 approximate
MANC class counts IN 13,066; DN 1,328; AN 1,862; MN 733; EN 92; EA 9; SN 5,927; SA 535 v1.2.3 Cheong25 exact per class
BANC proofread neurons / incl. rough 114,518 / 155,916 v626 (paper) BANC26 exact per version; Codex v888 header says 158,262
BANC synaptic links 218,460,852 v626 BANC26 exact
BANC DNs / ANs 1,316 / 1,849 v626 BANC26 exact
Eck24 classifier accuracy 87 % per synapse (FAFB), 94 % per neuron, 91 % per cell type FAFB/FlyWire Eck24 exact
Eck24 per-type accuracy ACh 91 %, Glu 91 %, GABA 96 %, DA 90 %, OA 85 %, 5-HT 33 % (FAFB) FAFB Eck24 exact

2. Tier 1 — graph statistics (Lin24, FlyWire v630, ≥5-synapse graph)

These test flyconn.graph against an independent published analysis of the same graph. Requires the v630 Codex connections.csv.gz (≥5 synapses) restricted to the 127,978 v630 neurons.

Statistic Value Tolerance Notes
Nodes / edges 127,978 / 2,613,129 exact
Connection probability 0.000160 (Table 2) / 0.000161 (text) 3 s.f.
Reciprocity 0.138 ±0.001
Clustering coefficient 0.0463 (Table 2) vs 0.0477 (text) accept [0.046, 0.048] paper inconsistent
Mean connection strength 12.61 synapses (range 5–2,358) ±0.05
Mean in/out degree (intrinsic) 20.5; in–out Pearson R = 0.76 ±0.1
Giant SCC / WCC 93.3 % / 98.8 % of neurons ±0.1 pp
Mean shortest path (directed, SCC) 4.42 hops, max 13 ±0.02 undirected 3.91, max 11
Rich-club onset total degree > 37; 40,218 neurons; in-club density 0.000870 exact / ±1 %
Neurons in ≥1 reciprocal connection 77,607 ±0.5 %
Motif participants FFL 113,978; 3-unicycle 66,835 exact Table 1

3. Tier 2 — Shiu et al. LIF model (FlyWire v630, flyconn.sim)

3.1 Model parameters (must match exactly; from Shiu24 Methods and model.py)

Parameter Value model.py
V_rest = V_reset −52 mV v_0, v_rst (lines 22–23)
V_threshold −45 mV, spike when v > v_th (strict) v_th (24), eq_th (50)
Membrane time constant 20 ms (C 2 µF/cm² × R 10 kΩ·cm²) t_mbr (25)
Refractory 2.2 ms; 0 ms for Poisson-driven neurons t_rfc (31); lines 92/103
Synaptic decay τ 5 ms tau (28)
Synaptic delay 1.8 ms t_dly (34)
w_syn (single free parameter) 0.275 mV w_syn (37)
Edge weight Excitatory × Connectivity × w_syn line 183
Equations dv/dt = (v_0 − v + g)/t_mbr; dg/dt = −g/τ; on pre-spike g += w lines 44–48, 175
Reset v = v_rst; g = 0 (also w = 0 in code) eq_rst (52)
Integration Brian2 method='linear' (exact) line 163
Poisson drive PoissonInput(N=1, rate=r_poi, weight=w_syn*f_poi), f_poi = 250 ⇒ 68.75 mV jump onto v lines 85–91
Default r_poi 150 Hz (paper sweeps 10–200 Hz) line 39
Trials / duration 30 × 1,000 ms lines 17–18
Sign rule GABA, Glu ⇒ inhibitory; ACh, DA, OA, 5-HT ⇒ excitatory; per-neuron majority vote over presynapses with cleft score ≥ 50 Shiu24 Methods
"Activated" rate > 0 Hz in any of 30 trials Shiu24 text
Rate spikes per trial / 1 s, mean and s.d. over 30 trials (non-firing trials count 0) utils.get_rate
Silencing zero all outgoing weights of the neuron model.silence
Brian2 2.5.1, Python 3.10, numpy 1.24 environment.yml

3.2 Stimulus fixtures (root IDs from figures.ipynb; full lists in the raw note)

Set n Notes
Labellar sugar GRNs 21 canonical list; side labels inconsistent between paper and notebook — ignore them
Bitter GRNs / Ir94e GRNs / water GRNs 21 / 18 / 18
JONs (JO-CE 70, JO-F 60, JO-D/m 16) 146 IDs (paper says 147) notebook has an undefined-name bug in the neu_JON_all cell
MN9 720575940660219265 (contralateral, "MN9_r"), 720575940645521262 (ipsilateral)
aBN1 / aDN1 / aDN2 720575940630907434 / 720575940616185531 / 720575940629806974
SEZ split-GAL4 types 106 types, 372 neurons (sez_neurons.pickle)

3.3 Golden simulation outputs

Rung 1 of the validation ladder (spike-for-spike parity with Brian2 on small networks) has no published number; it is a self-consistency test. Rungs 2–3 use:

Test Published value Tolerance Source
Primary: 21 sugar GRNs @ 100 Hz → MN9 (…219265) mean rate 65.7 Hz (s.d. 3.31, Shiu-ST 1A); 67.03 ± 6.60 Hz (computed from repo sugarR_100Hz.parquet) mean in [58, 76] Hz (≈ ±1.5 s.d.); and MN9 contralateral > ipsilateral Shiu-ST 1A; Shiu-repo
Same @ 200 Hz 93.23 Hz (s.d. 5.18); 93.27 ± 3.15 (repo) [83, 103] Hz same
MN9 ipsilateral (…521262) @ 100 / 200 Hz 49.67 / 62.9 Hz ±2 s.d. (≈ ±9 / ±7 Hz) Shiu-ST 1A
MN9 full frequency series @ 10/50/100/150/200 Hz 0 / 19.43 / 65.7 / 83.67 / 93.23 Hz ±2 s.d. per point; monotone non-decreasing Shiu-ST 1A
Neurons activated (>0 Hz) by sugar @ 10 / 100 / 200 Hz 45 / 410 / 455 (incl. the 21 GRNs) ±5 % Shiu24 text; Shiu-ST 1A (computed)
Neurons spiking in repo example @ 100 / 200 Hz; total spikes 404 / 448; 289,073 / 511,566 ±5 % computed from repo parquet
Shuffled-connectome control (100 shuffles, 100 Hz) MN9 > 0 Hz in 1 of 100 shuffles (correct connectome: 68.0 Hz) ≤ 2/100 Shiu-ST 1D
MN11 (…165019 / …868793) @ 100 Hz 88.97 / 85.87 Hz ±15 % Shiu-ST 1A
MN8 (…352063) @ 100 Hz 68.73 Hz ±15 % Shiu-ST 1A
Zorro (…888530) @ 100 / 200 Hz 102.23 / 146.13 Hz ±15 % Shiu-ST 1A
Sugar-responsive & sufficient for MN9 / also required 47 / 14 exact set size ±2 Shiu24 text (needs the top-200 protocol)
SEZ screen @ 50 Hz: types activating MN9 11 (roundup 79.5, diatom 29.13, sink_sync 22.17, G2N-1 12.37, clavicle 10.5, Fdg 22.53, bract 33.67, rattle 1.87, FMIn 0.37, TH-VUM 0.03, kitty 7.3 Hz) set membership ±1 Shiu-ST 3
Overall accuracy vs experiment 150/164 = 91.46 %; excl. Fig 2: 49/58 = 84.48 % documentation only Shiu-ST 10
w_syn −30 % / +30 % → MN9 @ 100 Hz 33.46 / 96.1 Hz ±15 % Shiu-ST 11A
JO-CE vs JO-F @ 150 Hz → aBN1 50.77 (s.d. 1.36) vs 1.23 Hz (s.d. 0.92) 50.77 ± 15 %; JO-F < 3 Hz Shiu-ST 8
147 JONs @ 140 Hz → aBN1 / aDN1 / aDN2 45.27 / 16.67 / 17.13 Hz ±2 s.d. (≈ ±5 Hz) Shiu-ST 7A
JONs @ 20…220 Hz: neurons >0 Hz 227 / 367 / 503 / 628 / 720 / 823 at 20/60/100/140/180/220 Hz ±5 % computed from Shiu-ST 7A
Sugar vs water overlap @ 40 Hz MN9 sugar 377, water 391, shared 250 (paper; naive recount of ST 4 gives 280) 377/391 ±5 %; overlap documented only Shiu24 Fig 3f; Shiu-ST 4

Independent cross-check: the third-party MLX port reports 67.30 Hz for the 100 Hz example, inside the proposed band.

3.4 Pure-connectivity checks derived from the same fixtures

Check Value Tolerance
Synapses JO-CE → aBN1 / JO-F → aBN1 103 / 78 exact (Shiu24 Fig 5g; computable from the v630 parquet with the ID lists)
NT split of the 613 taste-responsive neurons 52 % ACh, 25.9 % GABA, 17 % Glu, 2.9 % 5-HT, 2.0 % DA, 0.2 % OA exact if recomputed from ST 4

4. Tier 3 — cross-dataset variability (Schl24; null model for flyconn.compare)

Edges are cell-type → cell-type, unthresholded, FlyWire v783 left vs right and FlyWire vs hemibrain v1.2.1.

Quantity Value Tolerance
Pre/post-synapse counts per matched type: within brain / across brains Pearson R 0.99 / 0.92 (pre), 0.76 (post) ±0.01
Edge-weight correlation within / across brains R 0.97 / 0.8 ±0.01
Cosine-similarity effect size across vs within 0.045 ± 0.096 exact (absolute cosine values only in Fig 4d image)
Edge persistence 53 % hemibrain→FlyWire; L→R 61 %, R→L 59 %; 572,980 edges in ≥1 hemisphere ±1 pp
1-synapse hemibrain edge present in one / both FlyWire hemispheres 42 % / 16 % ±1 pp
>90 % persistence rule edges >10 synapses or ≥0.9 % of target input exact
99 % persistence rule >2.6 % of input or 31 synapses exact
30-synapse edge regression hemibrain 30 → FlyWire mean 29 (25 % <13, 5 % 1–2); FlyWire L 30 → R mean 31 (25 % ≤21, 5 % 1–8) ±1 synapse
Technical-noise model 65 % of L/R edge-weight variability within 5–95 % noise range; ≤30 % weight differences may be pure noise key null-model parameter
Cell-count variability KCs 2,597 R / 2,580 L / 1,917 hemibrain; average per-type variation 5 ± 12 %; hemilineage L/R 3 ± 4 % exact
Type matching 56 % (2,920/5,235) hemibrain types unambiguous; 664 merged/split; 1,651 not reidentified; 3,584 → 3,643 consensus types exact
NT prediction L/R agreement (Eck24) 1,586 L/R pairs; 95 % of 2,626 FlyWire/hemibrain types agree exact
BANC vs FAFB / MANC matched type connections 483,957 / 434,357 exact (BANC26)

5. Effective connectivity (CI25; parity targets for the connectome_interpreter wrapper)

Quantity Value Tolerance
Random cell-type pairs connected within 2 / 5 hops, threshold 0 ~70 % / 100 % ±5 pp (100×100 random sample)
Same at 1 % normalized-input threshold ~2 % / ~84 % ±5 pp
Central-brain in-degree mean ~130 partners (median ~90), ~80 types (median ~55) ±10 %
Worked monosynaptic examples (edge exists at 1 % input) HP5 → ipsilateral DNb05; JO-D → contralateral CB0916; JO-A/B → Giant Fiber, DNp02, DNp11; LPLC1 → DNa05 (2-hop) existence
DNa10 direct VPN inputs >1 % LLPC3, LPLC4, LC10d, LC10c, LTe64, LC22 set membership

No specific effective-connectivity values for named pathways appear in the text (only in figures), so parity with connectome_interpreter itself is the practical test: identical input matrix ⇒ identical compress_paths output.


6. Circuit facts checkable from connectivity alone (FlyWire v783 unless noted)

Fact Value Source
Descending neurons 1,303 (FlyWire); 1,316 (BANC); 1,328 (MANC) Dork24; BANC26; Cheong25
Ascending neurons 2,362 (FlyWire); 1,849 (BANC); 1,862 (MANC) same
Head motor neurons / endocrine 106 / 80 Dork24
ALPNs / canonical types ~130 / 58 Schl24
FC1–3 / FB1–9 neurons 357 / 897 Schl24
Ocellar ganglion 63 neurons; 15 DNs each receive >200 synapses from OCG01 Dork24
Hemilineages 183 hemilineages, 88 % (30,233) of central-brain neurons Schl24
SEZ share of central-brain neuropil 17.8 %; DNs get 52 % of inputs in SEZ Dork24
Optic-lobe types (right OL) 156 types for 35,567 of 38,461 neurons Schl24

6b. Re-verified in this repo on 2026-09-26 (research venv, files in .cache/data/)

Check Result
MaleCNS annotations rows / neurons / types 211,577 / 166,700 / 11,751 ✓
MaleCNS NT rows 1,835,518 ✓
MaleCNS weights edges / sum / ≥5 / ≥10 151,856,684 / 311,833,243 / 7,622,864 / 2,799,910 ✓ (Arrow load 1.4 s)
Shiu v630 parquet edges / synapses / neurons / exc / inh / min 14,687,178 / 52,793,639 / 127,400 / 8,800,532 / 5,886,646 / 1 ✓
Codex v630 cell_stats.csv.gz rows 127,978 ✓ (= Lin24)
Codex v630 connections.csv.gz 3,794,615 rows (one per pre, post, neuropil); 2,613,129 distinct pre→post pairs, all with summed syn_count ≥5 ✓ (= Lin24 exactly)
Codex v783 connections.csv.gz 3,869,878 rows; 2,700,513 distinct pairs ≥5 ✓ (= Dork24 exactly; so Lin24's 2,701,601 is the outlier)
Codex v783 cell_stats.csv.gz rows 139,246 (9 neurons lack morphology stats); neurons.csv.gz and classification.csv.gz both have 139,255 rows ✓ — use those for the neuron count

M1 converter output for MaleCNS v1.0, neuron universe superclass IS NOT NULL (166,700), first computed 2026-09-26 and pinned as regression targets in tests/golden/test_tier0_counts.py:

Quantity Value
Neuron→neuron edges 25,582,938 (= Phase 0 superclass→superclass count)
Weight sum 124,177,617 (= Σ input_synapses_neurons = Σ output_synapses_neurons)
Edges ≥5 / ≥10 6,242,118 / 2,753,975
Σ input_synapses_total (incl. fragments) / Σ output_synapses_total 130,453,923 / 295,069,014
Consensus NT over the universe ACh 103,720; Glu 29,302; GABA 22,069; His 7,891; unclear 3,177; DA 392; OA 101; 5-HT 48
Conversion cost (M4 Pro) 26 s, peak RSS 5.7 GB; store 4.4 MB neurons + 74.9 MB edges Parquet
--level nt-probs (tbar file, 45.7 M presynapses) 165,665 neurons with per-body mean probabilities; argmax(mean) = consensus label for 96.2 % (M3, 2026-09-27)

FlyWire via the same converter: v783 139,255 neurons / 2,700,513 edges / 3,869,878 neuropil rows; v630 127,978 / 2,613,129.

Interpretation: the Codex connections.csv is the ≥5-synapse pair table split by neuropil (per-row syn_count can be <5). Summing over neuropils recovers the published connection counts exactly. Ingest must therefore aggregate neuropil rows before applying any threshold, and must keep the unthresholded Shiu parquet as a separate, sim-only edge source.

6c. Simulation golden runs reproduced by flyconn.sim (M4, 2026-09-27, M4 Pro, CPU float32, 30 trials x 1 s, seed 0)

Stimulus (21 sugar GRNs) MN9 contralateral MN9 ipsilateral Active neurons Published
100 Hz 66.5 ± 4.1 Hz 50.6 Hz 416 65.7 (ST 1A) / 67.0 (repo) Hz; 49.7 Hz; 404–410
200 Hz 94.5 Hz – 444 93.2 Hz; 455
10 Hz 0.0 Hz – 39 0 Hz; 45

Rung 1 (Brian2 2.10.1 spike-for-spike parity, fixed input trains, 60- and 200-neuron random nets): identical event sets. Rung 3 throughput (benchmarks/sim_throughput.json): CPU 2.2 s per biological second at 30 batched trials (15.0 s single trial), MPS 2.7 s; the per-tick Python loop dominates, so MPS gives no gain yet. After the chunked engine with the torch.compile tick kernel (2026-10-01), the three golden 30 x 1 s runs above give the same numbers (MN9 66.5 ± 4.1 / 94.5 / 0.0 Hz; 416 / 444 / 39 active neurons; 290,693 spikes at 100 Hz) in 13 / 11 / 11 s instead of 57 / 56 / 47 s. Current throughput rows (eager and compiled, CPU and MPS) are in benchmarks/sim_throughput.json; the machine was shared with other jobs, so treat them as indicative.

MaleCNS calibration protocol (78 LB3 GRNs -> 2 MN9, 5 trials x 0.5 s, CPU float32): MN9 rate at 100 / 200 Hz drive for w_syn 0.1, 0.2, 0.275, 0.4, 0.6 mV = 0.0/0.6, 31.4/55.2, 42.6/75.6, 65.6/103.4, 60.4/121.6 Hz. No value reaches 80 % of maximum (best 0.63 at 0.4 mV): unresolved.

6d. BANC v888 through the flyconn converter (M8, 2026-09-29)

Quantity flyconn Published
Neurons (proofread or rough, excluding glia/trachea/non-neurons) 155,858 155,916 proofread + roughly proofread (Bates 2026)
Descending / ascending 1,316 / 1,849 1,316 / 1,849
Edge-list rows / autapses dropped / neuron-neuron edges kept 11,752,828 / 156,311 / 11,401,953 doc: 11,510,975 rows, "autapses removed"

W3 male (MaleCNS v1.0) vs female, output partners, min_weight 5, 500 permutations:

Type vs FlyWire v783 (statistic, verdict) vs BANC v888, FlyWire-or-MANC vocabulary
PFL3 0.056, within between-brain range 0.082, within range
EPG 0.189, beyond range 0.088, within range
DNp01 p 0.52; 58 % of male output unmatched p 1.0; 0 % unmatched

6e. Hemibrain v1.2.1 and MANC v1.2.1 through the flyconn converters (2026-10-01)

tests/golden/test_hemibrain_manc.py; conversion takes about 2 s (hemibrain) and 1 s (MANC).

Quantity flyconn Reference
Hemibrain neurons (v1.2 export traced-neurons.csv) 21,739 export README: all non-cropped Traced neurons; neuPrint v1.2.1 Traced and not cropped: 21,739
Hemibrain edges / summed weight / edges with weight >= 5 3,550,403 / 14,329,229 / 662,578 same file (research note section 2.3)
Hemibrain traced bodies with Supp. 5 side/hemilineage / with NT feather row 21,328 / 21,709 Supp. 5 lists 25,397 bodies (incl. cropped)
Hemibrain NT argmax among traced (ACh / Glu / DA / GABA / 5-HT / OA / neither or none) 9,577 / 5,342 / 3,183 / 3,009 / 282 / 191 / 155 NT feather, provenance UNVERIFIED
MANC traced bodies (Codex) / neurons kept (sjcabs meta) / glia excluded 23,665 / 23,650 / 15 neuPrint manc:v1.2.1 Traced 23,665
MANC edge-list rows / summed count / neuron-neuron edges kept 5,305,354 / 30,943,884 / 5,303,770 neuPrint Traced->Traced 5,305,638 / 30,934,610
MANC NT (ACh / Glu / GABA / unknown or unclear) 11,518 / 6,274 / 5,733 / 125 neuPrint Traced predictedNt ACh 11,518, Glu 6,283, GABA 5,738 (incl. glia)
MANC super_class: descending / ascending / motor / sensory / sensory_ascending 1,322 / 1,862 / 721 / 5,925 / 535 Cheong 2025 (v1.2.3): DN 1,328, AN 1,862, MN 733, SN 5,927, SA 535

compare_type with MaleCNS v1.0, output partners, min_weight 5, 200 permutations, seed 0:

Pair Type n (a / b) Cross / within a / within b Statistic, p Unmatched a / b
MaleCNS vs hemibrain EPG 46 / 46 0.976 / 1.000 / 0.970 0.009, p 0.005 (within between-brain range) 0.001 / 0.0
MaleCNS vs hemibrain PFL3 24 / 24 0.832 / 0.990 / 0.307 -0.184, p 0.995 0.055 / 0.011
MaleCNS vs MANC DNa02 2 / 2 0.915 / 0.970 / 0.972 0.056, p 0.54 0.202 / 0.0
MaleCNS vs MANC DNp01 2 / 2 0.726 / 0.715 / 0.904 0.083, p 0.54 0.15 / 0.0

The hemibrain PFL3 within-dataset similarity (0.307) shows the hemibrain left/right null is unreliable for types whose left-side arbors leave the volume (see caveats); EPG and DNa02 are pinned in the golden test, PFL3 and DNp01 were run once (scratch script) and are not tests.

7. Known inconsistencies between sources (do not "fix" tests to the wrong one)

Item Values Decision
FlyWire v783 ≥5-synapse connections 2,700,513 (Dork24) vs 2,701,601 (Lin24) test against our own count of the Codex file; assert within 0.05 % of Dork24
FlyWire v630 neurons 127,978 (Lin24, Codex cell_stats) vs 127,400 (Shiu model file) two different snapshots/filters; the Shiu parquet is the sim golden input, Codex v630 is the data-layer input
Lin24 clustering coefficient 0.0463 (Table 2) vs 0.0477 (text) accept either
MaleCNS types 11,710 (Cell abstract) vs 11,751 (v1.0 file) test the file; document the abstract
MaleCNS dimorphic/male-specific types 138/289 (Cell abstract), 114/262 (preprint), file dimorphism column gives 102+65 "potentially" / 266+47 not a test; documented caveat
MaleCNS neurons 166,700 (Cell, v1.0 file) vs 166,691 (preprint) 166,700
Shiu JON count 147 (paper) vs 146 IDs (notebook) use the 146 IDs; note it
JO-CE / JO-F → aBN1 synapses 103 / 78 (Shiu24 Fig. 5g text) vs 77 / 69 computed from the repo notebook ID lists on the repo's own v630 parquet (all 146 JONs → aBN1: 148) not reproduced; the computed values are pinned in tests/golden/test_w1_paths.py; the paper likely used a different JON list or export (UNVERIFIED)
Shiu sugar/water overlap 250 (paper) vs 280 (naive recount) documented only
Hemibrain traced neurons 21,663 (v1.1 release blog, §1.4) vs 21,739 (v1.2 export traced-neurons.csv, = neuPrint v1.2.1 Traced and not cropped) test 21,739 against the v1.2 file
MANC edges sjcabs manc_121_simple_edgelist 5,305,354 rows / 30,943,884 synapses vs neuPrint manc:v1.2.1 Traced->Traced 5,305,638 / 30,934,610 test the pinned sjcabs file; the build's confidence threshold is undocumented
MANC class counts sjcabs v1.2.1 vocabulary (DN 1,322, MN 721, SN 5,925, plus 111 visceral_circulatory) vs Cheong 2025 v1.2.3 (DN 1,328, MN 733, SN 5,927) not a test; different annotation release and vocabulary
Codex "connections" header counts (e.g. 3,732,460 for v783) unstated definition never used as a test

8. Not found (so not tests)

  • Hemibrain v1.2.1 exact neuron and synapse totals in a quotable document.
  • Eck24 full 6×6 confusion matrix (figure only); Lin24 Extended Data Table 2 (unthresholded stats).
  • Schl24 absolute cosine-similarity values (figure only).
  • Numeric giant-fiber input counts.
  • Sapkal et al. 2024 firing rates (heatmaps only).
  • Shiu24 erratum: none exists (PubMed and Crossref checked).